Use of Force: Is the Media Helping or Hurting? Essay

/in /by

Would you like us to handle your paper? Use our company for better grades and meet your deadlines.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Final Paper Instructions:

  1. Include an introduction. It must provide a clear statement of your position on the topic.
  2. The paper should synthesize current, relevant research on your topic from at least six scholarly sources.
  3. Discuss the implications of possible solutions for the debate under investigation.
  4. Finally, offer your conclusions regarding how best to manage the issue (i.e., your informed opinion on the issues raised).

The paper must demonstrate what you have learned about current issues related to policing and how the many variables we’ve discussed in class influence the inner workings of police and their agencies. Your paper is expected to have depth and offer a thoughtful analysis on the topic. The paper should be based on references to scholarly materials (rather than on introductory textbooks, popular website writings, or musings, for example). That is, support your claims with evidence.

The most common mistakes in writing an essay are (a) simply summarizing the topic and not analyzing it or discussing your views and (b) failing to relate the subject to the broader context of policing, as discussed in class and as found in the readings. Adequately including the broader contexts includes, for example, considering how your research might yield a different approach to policing or considering the implications of your findings for police training.

Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
40.0 to >32.0 pts

Meets Expectation

The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

 32.0 to >24.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

 24.0 to >16.0 pts

Below Expectation

The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

 16.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
30.0 to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in the project introduction.

 24.0 to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation in the project introduction.

 18.0 to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

 12.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCurrent & Relevant Research
40.0 to >32.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of current, relevant research.

 32.0 to >24.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation of current, relevant research.

 24.0 to >16.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

 16.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplications of Possible Solutions
40.0 to >32.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation regarding implications of possible solutions.

 32.0 to >24.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation regarding implications of possible solutions.

 24.0 to >16.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

 16.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusions for Managing the Issue
40.0 to >32.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate critical analysis in conclusions for managing the issue.

 32.0 to >24.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical analysis of conclusions for managing the issue.

 24.0 to >16.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in critical analysis.

 16.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate critical analysis.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources
20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Cites and integrates at least six credible sources.

 16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Cites and integrates five credible sources.

 12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Cites and integrates four credible sources.

 8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Cites and integrates fewer than four credible sources.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Source Material
20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.

 16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

 12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

 8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format, including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.

 16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper essay format. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.

 12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper essay format. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements.

 8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper essay format. Does not conform to project requirements.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Style
20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.

 16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.

 12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.

 8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
30.0 to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with no more than one significant error.

 24.0 to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

 18.0 to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with four to five significant errors.

 12.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with more than five significant errors.

30.0 pts

Total Points: 300.0

Do you need help with this or a different assignment? We offer CONFIDENTIAL, ORIGINAL (Turnitin/LopesWrite/SafeAssign checks), and PRIVATE services using latest (within 5 years) peer-reviewed articles. Kindly click on ORDER NOW to receive an A++ paper from our masters- and PhD writers.

Get a 15% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE15


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper