Federal Acquisition Review (2 Page Paper)

Would you like us to handle your paper? Use our company for better grades and meet your deadlines.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Federal Acquisition Review (FAR) Part
15 – Negotiations states “Exchanges of information among all interested
parties, from the earliest identification of a requirement through receipt of
proposals, is encouraged.” When planning a competitive solicitation, the agency
must provide needed information in order to develop a thorough request that
takes into account the agency’s objectives for quality, schedule and costs.

Imagine that you are a contracts
officer for the Internal Revenue Services, and your supervisor has tasked you
with the procurement of a new software system for processing tax returns.

Review the Proposal Adequacy Checklist.(http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfars/html/current/252215.htm#252.215-7009)

Write a two to three (2-3) page paper
in which you:

1 
Analyze the proposal adequacy checklist
 for organizing a proposal, and summarize the intrinsic value of two (2)
of the suggestions on the checklist. Prepare and articulate an argument in
support of your position.

2 
Debate whether or not the offeree
should let an offeror’s mistake within a proposal go uncorrected, even if such
action would cause the offeror to withstand a loss. Suggest one (1) judicial
remedy available to the offeror to prevent his / her loss. Provide an argument
in support of your position. 

3 
Use at least three (3) quality
academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia does not qualify
as an academic resource.

Do you need help with this or a different assignment? We offer CONFIDENTIAL, ORIGINAL (Turnitin/LopesWrite/SafeAssign checks), and PRIVATE services using latest (within 5 years) peer-reviewed articles. Kindly click on ORDER NOW to receive an A++ paper from our masters- and PhD writers.

Get a 15% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE15


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper